Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Accuracy of Surgical Robot System Compared to Surgical Guide for Dental Implant Placement: A Pilot Study

Jin Xun, ±èÁø¿µ, ¹ÚÁö¸¸, Á¤ÀÇ¿ø, Â÷Àç±¹, ½ÉÁؼº, Ç㼺ÁÖ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Jin Xun ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
±èÁø¿µ ( Kim Ryan Jin-Young ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Dental Research Institute
¹ÚÁö¸¸ ( Park Ji-Man ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
Á¤ÀÇ¿ø ( Jung Ui-Won ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
Â÷Àç±¹ ( Cha Jae-Kook ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
½ÉÁؼº ( Shim June-Sung ) - Yonsei University College of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
Ç㼺ÁÖ ( Heo Seong-Joo ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics

Abstract


Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the tracking accuracy of a robot-guided implant surgery system and compare the spatial accuracy of robot-assisted implant surgery with that of static stentguided implant surgery for implant placement.

Materials and Methods: The tracking accuracy of the robot system was evaluated by measuring the discrepancy between the robot arm and actual programmed position. Dental implants were placed on 3D printed human phantom models using static stent-guided and robot-assisted surgeries. The top, apex, angular, and depth deviations of the placed implant positions were measured relative to the planned position, and the values were compared between the robot and surgical guide groups. The results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (¥á = .05).

Results: The tracking accuracy of the robot system showed a linear deviation of 0.13 ¡¾ 0.04 mm and an angular deviation of 0.77 ¡¾ 0.02¡Æ at the drill tip. Deviations at the top and apex of the implants were 0.61 ¡¾ 0.29 mm and 0.50 ¡¾ 0.14 mm in the robot group and of 0.49 ¡¾ 0.39 mm and 0.72 ¡¾ 0.39 mm in the surgical guide group, respectively. Angular and depth deviations were of 2.38 ¡¾ 0.62¡Æ and 0.17 ¡¾ 0.12 mm, respectively, in the robot group, and of 3.16 ¡¾ 2.36¡Æ and 0.15 ¡¾ 0.11 mm, respectively, in the surgical guide group. No statistically significant differences were found between the robotic and surgical guide groups (p > .05).

Conclusion: The accuracy in implant placement using robot-assisted implant surgery was comparable to that of static-guided surgery. Robot-assisted implant surgery and static-guided surgery tended to result in minor deviations at the apex and top of the implants, respectively.

Å°¿öµå

Accuracy; Dental implant; Robot-assisted implant surgery; Static-guided implant surgery

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸